AI Employee Coaching Assessment Checklist
AI coaching tools may allow employees to practise workplace conversations and receive automated feedback. Use this checklist before introducing a platform that records, transcribes, scores or analyses employee interactions.
AI coaching tools may allow employees to practise workplace conversations and receive automated feedback. Use this checklist before introducing a platform that records, transcribes, scores or analyses employee interactions.
This checklist provides general business guidance and is not legal advice. Businesses introducing AI coaching should consider consulting an employment lawyer and data-protection specialist, particularly where scores may influence employment decisions.
Step 1 — Identify the use case
- □ Supplier
- □ Product
- □ Scenario
- □ Business purpose
- □ Business owner
- □ HR owner
- □ Technical owner
- □ Intended users
- □ Voluntary or mandatory
- □ Pilot or production
Step 2 — Define the purpose
- □ Private practice
- □ Developmental coaching
- □ Training completion
- □ Skills assessment
- □ Recruitment
- □ Performance management
- □ Promotion
- □ Compliance evidence
- □ Other (specify)
Do not describe the system as coaching if the results will be used for formal employment decisions without saying so clearly.
Step 3 — Map the data
Does the system capture:
- □ Name
- □ Employee ID
- □ Voice
- □ Video
- □ Transcript
- □ Score
- □ Feedback
- □ Repeated attempts
- □ Session duration
- □ Facial data
- □ Device data
- □ Manager comments
For each item checked, record: purpose · location · retention period · access controls · deletion method.
Step 4 — Review visibility
Who can see:
- □ Session completion
- □ Transcript
- □ Recording
- □ Feedback
- □ Score
- □ Number of attempts
- □ Historic trends
- □ Team comparison
- □ Individual ranking
Prefer private practice and aggregate reporting where possible.
Step 5 — Review the rubric
- □ Criteria documented
- □ Business owner assigned
- □ HR review completed
- □ Employee-facing explanation available
- □ Tested across different communication styles
- □ Tested across accents
- □ Tested across supported languages
- □ Accessibility reviewed
- □ Weighting understood
- □ Pass threshold justified
- □ Human challenge process available
Step 6 — Review fairness and accessibility
- □ Alternative participation method available
- □ Reasonable adjustments defined
- □ Speech impairments considered
- □ Hearing impairments considered
- □ Neurodivergence considered
- □ First-language differences considered
- □ Accent differences tested
- □ Assistive technology supported
- □ Employees can request human coaching
Step 7 — Review data protection
- □ Privacy notice provided
- □ Lawful basis documented
- □ Necessity assessed
- □ Proportionality assessed
- □ DPIA completed where appropriate
- □ Retention limited
- □ Access restricted
- □ Employee rights supported
- □ Subprocessors reviewed
- □ Customer-data training setting understood
Step 8 — Review employment use
Will the score affect:
- □ Appraisal
- □ Probation
- □ Promotion
- □ Pay
- □ Training access
- □ Shift allocation
- □ Disciplinary action
- □ Dismissal
- □ Recruitment
Where yes, confirm:
- □ Human review is meaningful and independent
- □ Employee can challenge the result
- □ Independent evidence is considered alongside the score
- □ Legal and HR review completed
Step 9 — Review security
- □ Single sign-on
- □ Multi-factor authentication
- □ Role-based permissions
- □ Encryption in transit and at rest
- □ Audit logging
- □ Secure deletion
- □ Export controls
- □ Tenant separation
- □ Incident notification terms
- □ Contract reviewed
Step 10 — Run a safe pilot
- □ Low-risk scenario selected
- □ Volunteers used
- □ Scores not linked to HR decisions
- □ Private practice enabled
- □ Short retention period set
- □ Employee feedback collected
- □ Accuracy tested
- □ Accessibility tested
- □ Human coaching retained
- □ Stop criteria agreed
Step 11 — Make a decision
- □ Approved for private practice
- □ Approved for limited pilot
- □ Approved with restrictions
- □ Further evidence required
- □ DPIA required
- □ Equality review required
- □ Legal review required
- □ Not approved
Record: decision maker · date · restrictions · corrective actions · action owner · next review date.
Want the full explanation?
Read our Technology Intelligence article for a plain-English explanation of how AI coaching works, the difference between coaching and employee monitoring, what the law requires and what businesses should do before adopting an AI roleplay platform.
Plain-English Takeaway
AI coaching can give employees a useful place to practise, but the organisation must be clear about what is recorded, who sees the results and whether scores can affect employment decisions. Keep developmental practice private where possible, test the scoring for fairness and accessibility, provide meaningful human review and retain only the data genuinely required.
Downloadable guide
Download the AI Employee Coaching Assessment Checklist
A printable checklist for reviewing employee privacy, AI scoring, accessibility, management visibility, retention and human oversight.
Download PDFFree download. No email address required.
Want the full business explanation?
The Technology Intelligence article covers why this matters, where it helps and what to watch out for.
Read the full Technology Intelligence articleRelated Knowledge Centre resources
AI Agent Safety Checklist
Review an AI agent’s tools, permissions, data access, network connections, human approvals, monitoring and emergency-stop controls.
View guideAI Training Data Supplier Checklist
Review where an AI supplier’s training data came from, what rights apply, how customer data is used and what contractual protection is provided.
View guideQuestions to Ask Before Buying an AI Tool
The practical questions that separate useful AI tools from expensive experiments.
View guide